justin drew bieber baby pics

justin drew bieber baby pics. mediajustin drew bieber
  • mediajustin drew bieber



  • evilgEEk
    Jul 18, 08:16 PM
    i wouldnt even pay a $1.99 if the resolution is the same as the current video content on iTunes... HORRID!
    I'm definitely with you there. I want to both rent and purchase movies, but if they're going to be 320x240 then forget it. I'm not paying my hard-earned cash for that.

    DVD quality and at least 5.1 surround is what I would require before I rented any movies from Apple.





    justin drew bieber baby pics. Release Name: Justin_Bieber-
  • Release Name: Justin_Bieber-



  • monke
    Jan 1, 07:05 PM
    This year better be good!

    I sure hope so.

    Where did you find that image? Are there others?

    On the Apple website, right in the middle of the main page. :)





    justin drew bieber baby pics. Nothings stopped justin drew
  • Nothings stopped justin drew



  • lordonuthin
    Nov 18, 07:57 PM
    ^yeah almost seems unfair to ppl that want to compete but dont have access to high end hardware. i guess if you look at it from an aggregate standpoint then low point crunchers make a bit of a diff.

    the amount of power sucked from the wall per unit would be WAY less i would imagine. from an environmental standpoint it wouldnt make sense

    That's why I dropped the G5 after I saw how little it was doing against the Mac Pro and even the low end amd's, it just wasn't worth it in terms of the electric bill.

    And speaking of electric bills... I'm just kind of guessing here but I think folding is costing me about $50 a month :eek:





    justin drew bieber baby pics. by Justin-Drew-Bieber-Malette-
  • by Justin-Drew-Bieber-Malette-



  • mrgreen4242
    Aug 31, 07:47 AM
    Yes I agree that is what you would expect as would I. But it doesn't work that way. They are more than likely to stay just where they are.

    Look at how old some of that stuff is from 2005 - a few even from 2004 - there and how they are still priced as if they hadn't long ago been replaced by more powerful models. Makes no sense. But there it is to study and see. :confused: :eek:

    They're still selling Quad G5's for $2799 which is rediculous.

    Er... The quad G5 isn't available new anymore, so it costs what it costs (there's nothing in the regular store to compare it to - the Mac Pro is NOT a one for one replacement)... IF this rumor is true, then the current lineup is just getting shuffled down with a new top end added, then they would have to drop refurb prices or it wouldn't make any sense.

    Now if they just shuffle the CPU down (so the base mini still has a Combo drive and 60gb HDD, but gets a 1.66 Core Duo) they will STILL have to drop the refurb price... A new regular price Solo with SD and 80gb HDD is currently $699, which is the current Core Duo refurb price.

    If they completely revamp the lineup then they may keep the same pricing, but seems highly unlikey as noone would buy them and keeping uneeded inventory on hand is bad business.





    justin drew bieber baby pics. girlfriendjustin drew
  • girlfriendjustin drew



  • frankie
    Sep 1, 03:42 PM
    Many of the people on this thread are too new to remember the Performa fiascos of the early 90's. More than anything, Steve simplified the computer product line into 4 distinct quadrants. The only aberration to this is the Mac Mini.

    Many of the people who bring up the Performa era are failing to remember that there were typically twenty or more Mac models at any given time. 20 is too many. 4 is too few. Many of us would be much happier if Apple offered 6-8 models (specifically, the xMac).






    justin drew bieber baby pics. Wants ieber , aby, i thinks
  • Wants ieber , aby, i thinks



  • plinden
    Jul 20, 12:37 PM
    Currently reporting at $60.80 at 12:44 ET. Up 6.73 from yesterday.

    Yahoo article reports: According to Gartner, Apple shipped 766,000 PCs in the second quarter of the year, good enough for 4.6% of the U.S. market, and a 15.4% increase over a year ago. Apple's growth rate exceeded those of the No. 1 and No. 2 PC companies, Dell Inc.:)
    Just to give some more figures - Gartner says worldwide PC sales are 55 million compared to 49.5 million this time last year, and 16.6 million in the US compared to 15.6 million last year.

    But I wonder where they got 766,000 from. The sales figures separate out retail from regional sales, but considering that most Apple stores are in the US, the vast majority of the 216,000 retail sales would be in the US, so US sales could be anything between 642,000-858,000. That's 3.9%-5.2% US market share. Looks like they picked a percentage right in the middle, but I would say it's nearer to 5%. Of course, worldwide it's still only 2.4%.

    To put this in perspective, Dell sold 9.73 million PC worldwide and 5.3 million in the US, ie. 7x Apple's shipments.





    justin drew bieber baby pics. hated Drew bieber baby at
  • hated Drew bieber baby at



  • Evan_11
    Jul 18, 10:34 AM
    iTunes is the best place to release your movie via the internet if you want it to be seen. FrontRow I have found works great for streaming movie trailers and the quality is pretty good too (though not DVD quality but much better than anything iPod video encoded).

    Anyway if implemented beyond just studio movies this could be a major milestone for independent filmmaking.





    justin drew bieber baby pics. And justin drew bieber as
  • And justin drew bieber as



  • mi5moav
    Jul 19, 07:02 PM
    Well, during 2000-2001 that was a long waiting period for OSX... and then of course during the Q4 of 2001 we had 9-11





    justin drew bieber baby pics. Old+justin+drew+ieber
  • Old+justin+drew+ieber



  • scott523
    Nov 15, 11:18 AM
    Wow envious benchmark results there. Anybody notice the 74GB 10,000RPM HD on the Intel QX6700 spec (that's first for me)? :eek:





    justin drew bieber baby pics. Drew bieber facts,jul , about
  • Drew bieber facts,jul , about



  • CyberB0b
    Sep 7, 08:15 AM
    Am I the only one that doesn't care what they sell? As long as they make some neat hardware to play with that I can use to stream my own stuff...





    justin drew bieber baby pics. Justin Drew Bieber or more
  • Justin Drew Bieber or more



  • toddybody
    Mar 24, 01:58 PM
    Still a monster, just a smaller monster. Kinda like 6970 is to Godzukei what 6990 is to Godzilla. ;)

    Just for you buddy:) IMO, you could beat Godzilla to death with this

    http://media.bestofmicro.com/Radeon-HD-6990,3-H-278765-13.jpg





    justin drew bieber baby pics. to Justin Drew Bieber lt;3
  • to Justin Drew Bieber lt;3



  • amarcus
    Jun 22, 12:00 PM
    Then what was the point in the iPad?





    justin drew bieber baby pics. Drew bieber , young, rare,
  • Drew bieber , young, rare,



  • milo
    Aug 29, 09:16 AM
    Yeah, imagine that. Their top-of-the-like 64bit full-tower quad-core workstation and their bottom-of-the-barrel consumer-model have wildly different specs!

    Which would be fine...if there were a model in the middle. It's like a car company selling a huge SUV and a tiny two door car, with nothing in between.





    justin drew bieber baby pics. Bieber,feb , atlanta aby and
  • Bieber,feb , atlanta aby and



  • RebootD
    Apr 12, 10:01 PM
    Well they just announced it's on the App Store and in June. Only $299!





    justin drew bieber baby pics. For you Justin Drew Bieber
  • For you Justin Drew Bieber



  • McGiord
    Apr 2, 07:30 PM
    They always find a way to zoom in the screen and make it look nicer than what it actually is. The resolution is too grainy.

    I am spoiled by the iPhone 4 display.





    justin drew bieber baby pics. by Justin Drew Bieber on
  • by Justin Drew Bieber on



  • Lord Blackadder
    Mar 1, 02:45 PM
    But the damn things are noisy, and the exhaust smells really bad.

    That may be true of the huge American diesel truck engines, but go examine a new VW, BMW or Mercedes diesel and you'll see that this is just not the case anymore. They sound a little different, smell a little different, but not worse than gasoline - it's just that we are so used to gas engines that everything else is assumed to be worse somehow.





    justin drew bieber baby pics. Justin Bieber - My Worlds The
  • Justin Bieber - My Worlds The



  • polsons
    Jan 11, 07:20 AM
    As a fellow Australian imac_japan i'll support your enthusiasm, but as one who is old enough to have actually witnessed the history of Apple I think you are about to be enormously disappointed

    If indeed a headless Mac does materialize, it will not be the first to have come from Apple. Apple have tried this concept many times before and all attempts have failed miserably. Maybe a dual G5 Cube for the price of an eMac might have some success, but a miserably under specified G4 (as is being claimed) is DEAD even before it hits the stores.

    True the end may be near for Apple's hardware (5 or 10 years so to speak), but MacOS will be around for as long as computers continue to be manufactured. Even the most pessimistic analyst will concede that MacOS X and Apple's apps on x86 would see Microsoft as the world's second largest software developer. And who really cares about the hardware. The best PC hardware is every bit as good as Apple's hardware....it's just that the software stinks.

    Let's be honest here. Do we really want Mac OS X to become MS Windows? Yes, Windows has thousands of apps not available on Mac, but most are developed by egotistical script kiddies with absolutely no idea of what they are doing, and then trying to pass it off as the greatest app ever written solely because they coded it. The best Windows apps always have been and probably always will be available on Mac. But they are long established mature apps developed by long established developers. If you can't afford them, then buy a PC and be content with using script kiddie crap.

    And therein lies the unique and most appealing aspect of Apple hardware. MORONS can't afford it. As long as Apple keeps developing MacOS X and morons are forced to buy Windows PC's, I'll remain very happy with the current situation as it stands. No $499 headless Mac and no Mac in every home for me thank you. As far as I am concerned, the last thing I want to see is a user base swarming with dickheads. Windows has already reached that plateau, and sadly Linux is running not that far behind.





    justin drew bieber baby pics. Justin Bieber Is The AMA
  • Justin Bieber Is The AMA



  • 21stcenturykid
    Jan 1, 05:49 PM
    Could apple maybe announce tv shows for uk itunes? IF not does anyone have any ideas when they might be releaseing these??





    justin drew bieber baby pics. tour bus ahead Drew bieber
  • tour bus ahead Drew bieber



  • MacLuvin
    Apr 6, 11:18 AM
    I am using a late 2010 MBP, i5, 8GB RAM and I have no lagging issues with launchpad other than a slight delay opening folders. I don't use it much so it is not a noticible issue for me. Apps scroll quickly and I am able to page left or right seamlessly.

    So when you click on the Launchpad icon everything comes up smooth and no delay/lag or doesn't act sluggish? just the opening of folders ?

    There's lag for me launching launchpad and also scrolling through its pages and going/creating folders. However I do believe this will be fixed later on as it can't be that demanding to run OSX LION





    archer75
    Apr 19, 11:45 AM
    It was rumored just prior to the macbook pro refresh that they might come with a small 16gb SSD drive just for the OS. Wouldn't surprise me to see that make it's way into an imac. Large SSD's are just too expensive and often times not big enough. And you only get a finite number of writes on them before they're garbage.





    globalhemp
    Nov 29, 04:05 PM
    AT&T offers a service called "Homezone" (http://www.sbc.com/gen/general?pid=7910) which uses 2WIRE (http://www.2wire.com/?p=11) products.

    Of course, it has an ugly interface you'd expect from most companies outside Apple. Microsoft's Media Center even does a better job.

    I hope that Apple's iTV will do more than play content that's in the next room on my iMac, I'd much rather see an offering that allows my home / office to be remotely accessed such as what is possible today with Sling Media (http://www.slingmedia.com/indexa.php).

    1. You attach a Sling Box to your cable / satellite tv at home / work
    2. Attach your broadband network to Sling Box
    3. Access your Sling Box from anywhere that has a broadband connection

    So, if you live in Sunnyvale, CA, you can travel to Chicago and still watch the local news in Silicon Valley or San Francisco. Or, you can travel to Tokyo and watch not only the news from back home, but any of your satellite / cable channels, as well as content on your DVR. I'm sure that you could even hook-up a camera to see your wife and kids at home if you wanted to as well.

    Anyhow, I think this is much cooler than watching a slideshow of the photos on my iMac in the next room, or listening to the music from my iMac on my television. I mean AirTunes pretty much already does that.

    So, I'm still hopeful that Apple has something more up their sleeves. Otherwise, iTV will be as popular as oh, say the iPod Hi-Fi.

    As for portable movies, a true video iPod already exists as well. Its called "PocketDish" (http://www.pocketdish.com/?section=home) from DishNetwork. PocketDish allows users to sync their DVR content and take it with them. So, record Spiderman for the kids, sync it, and go on that road trip. The largest PocketDish has a 7" LCD (480x234 pixel resolution) and sells for $399.





    QCassidy352
    Apr 2, 07:52 PM
    great ad. Totally unnecessary, since it's impossible to buy one in most places, but great ad nonetheless.





    AidenShaw
    Nov 18, 08:50 PM
    When Intel multicore processors are used (as in the Mac Pro) which support hardware virtualization, you can run software (such as Parrallels Desktop) that lets your run additional operating systems (such as Windows, Solaris, and Linux) concurrently with OSX at near full native speeds since one or more cores are used for OSX and one is used for each of the virtual operating systems.
    The virtualization example is the same as your multiple application example.

    Cores are not dedicated to virtual machines - each virtual machine is an application that needs to use CPU power from time to time.

    With multi-core, there are more CPUs so that the VM applications can be scheduled at the same time. Just like more standard applications (or application threads) can be scheduled simultaneously.

    Assigning processors to specific applications is almost always a bad idea. It is better to let the operating system schedule any thread that needs CPU on any idle CPU in a multi-CPU (multi-core) system.





    Conner36
    Mar 25, 04:33 PM
    I will be happy when you dont have to use the dongle but can use an AppleTV to do the processing and have the iphone/ipad/ipodtouch useable as a controller.